A GENDER PERFORMATIVITY ANALYSIS ON GENDER NORMS PORTRAYED IN LOUISA MAY ALCOTT’S LITTLE WOMEN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35842/jolali.v3i1.48Keywords:
feminism, gender norm, gender performativity, romanceAbstract
This research analyses gender norms and performativity in Louisa May Alcott's Little Women (1868) using Judith Butler's gender performativity theory. Alcott's semi-autobiographical portrayal of the March sisters paints a vivid picture of nineteenth-century American gender norms and their societal ramifications. This study focuses on Jo March and Theodore "Laurie" Lawrence and examines how their refusal to comply with standard gender norms reveals the performativity of gender. Jo, an outspoken and ambitious writer, and Laurie, a sensitive aspiring musician, are both subjected to social pressures to conform to traditional conceptions of femininity and masculinity, resulting in feelings of alienation and misfitting. By examining their problems, the research demonstrates how gender, as defined by societal and cultural assumptions, limits individual expression and imposes conformity. The study uses Butler's framework to show how Alcott's characters adopt gendered behaviors to fulfill society's expectations, emphasizing the tension between uniqueness and societal conventions. The research dives deeper into Alcott's subversion of preconceptions, as seen by Jo's rejection of traditional female roles and Laurie's challenges to masculine standards. Finally, this research emphasizes Little Women's ongoing importance as a critique of gender stereotypes and a reflection on the larger societal assumptions that shape identity. This study reinforces the importance of Alcott's work in conversations about gender performativity and societal expectations by locating it within feminist discourse.
References
Alcott, L. M. (1994). Little women. Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1868)
Beauvoir, S. de. (1953). The second sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). Alfred A. Knopf.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Dubois, E. C. (2000). Harriot Stanton Blatch and the winning of woman suffrage. Yale University Press.
Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. L. (1986). Linking data. Sage Publications.
Garland-Thompson, R. (2011). Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia, 26(3), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01206.x
Kaminski, M. (2010). Reading Little Women: The many lives of a timeless classic. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Rampton, M. (2015). Four waves of feminism. Pacific University Oregon. https://www.pacificu.edu
Reisen, H. (2009). Louisa May Alcott: The woman behind Little Women. Henry Holt and Company.
Salih, S. (2002). On Judith Butler and performativity. The Critical Quarterly, 44(4), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8705.00312
Ratnaningrum, D. (2009). The representation of gender roles in 19th-century American literature. [Thesis, University of Indonesia Press].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JOLALI: Journal of Language and Literature

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JOLALI: Journal of Language and Literature right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in JOLALI: Journal of Language and Literature.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in JOLALI: Journal of Language and Literature.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).